R v Bazouni (Release Application) [2019] NSWDC 757
The applicant has not established that special or exceptional circumstances exist; while the appeal may be likely to succeed, it does not meet the demanding statutory test of being 'most likely to succeed'. The direction issue is arguable, but the Crown's position has merit, and the absence of objection at trial further weighs against the application.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Offender: Mr John Bazouni
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Bail Pending Appeal After Conviction, Pre Sentence
- Outcome
- Application for bail pending appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Bail Application, Exceptional Circumstances, Appeal Grounds, Jury Directions, Dishonesty, Recklessness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Mr John Bazouni
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Bail Pending Appeal After Conviction, Pre Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there are special or exceptional circumstances justifying bail pending appeal under section 22 of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW)
- 2 Whether the appeal is 'most likely to succeed' given the alleged error in jury directions regarding recklessness as to dishonesty
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant has not established that special or exceptional circumstances exist; while the appeal may be likely to succeed, it does not meet the demanding statutory test of being 'most likely to succeed'. The direction issue is arguable, but the Crown's position has merit, and the absence of objection at trial further weighs against the application.
Court Disposition
Application for bail pending appeal refused.
Orders
- The application for release on bail is declined.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment