Re Guss, Joseph Ex Parte Guss, Joseph v Johnstone, Raymond Marshall [1996] FCA 457
The affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant did not provide evidence of a real or effective cross-claim or set-off, but merely made assertions. Thus, it did not satisfy s 41(7) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966, and the act of bankruptcy is deemed to have occurred at the expiration of the bankruptcy notice.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Hearing of Objection to Bankruptcy Notice Under S 41(7) Bankruptcy Act 1966
- Outcome
- Affidavit held non-compliant with s 41(7); act of bankruptcy to stand as at expiration of the notice.
- Legal Topics
- ['bankruptcy Notice' 'counter Claim' 'affidavit Requirements' 'act of Bankruptcy']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Hearing of Objection to Bankruptcy Notice Under S 41(7) Bankruptcy Act 1966
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the affidavit filed satisfied the requirements of subsection 41(7) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966' 'Whether a cross-claim, set-off or cross demand was sufficiently established to suspend or terminate the operation of the bankruptcy notice']
Ratio Decidendi
The affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant did not provide evidence of a real or effective cross-claim or set-off, but merely made assertions. Thus, it did not satisfy s 41(7) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966, and the act of bankruptcy is deemed to have occurred at the expiration of the bankruptcy notice.
Court Disposition
Affidavit held non-compliant with s 41(7); act of bankruptcy to stand as at expiration of the notice.
Orders
- ['It is ordered and declared that the affidavit filed on behalf of the judgment debtor does not answer the description of an affidavit required by subsection 41(7) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966.' 'The act of bankruptcy is deemed to have occurred at the expiration of the bankruptcy notice.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment