Vicini, Aldo v E.A. Sealey & Company [1982] FCA 156
The debtor was not legally inhibited from setting up the counter-claim in the original Local Court action and in fact did so by filing an amended defence and counter-claim; inability to produce supporting evidence at the time did not constitute inability in law to set up the counter-claim, so the affidavit did not meet the requirements of s.41(7) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966.
- Parties
- Judgment Debtor: MR. ALDO VICINI; Judgment Creditor: E.A. SEALEY & CO
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 August 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Application Under S.41(7) of Bankruptcy Act 1966
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bankruptcy Notice, Counter Claim, Affidavit Requirements, Extension of Time
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MR. ALDO VICINI
Judgment Debtor
E.A. SEALEY & CO
Judgment Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Application Under S.41(7) of Bankruptcy Act 1966
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the debtor could have set up a counter-claim in the action in which the judgment was obtained for the purposes of s.40(1)(g) and s.41(7) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966
Ratio Decidendi
The debtor was not legally inhibited from setting up the counter-claim in the original Local Court action and in fact did so by filing an amended defence and counter-claim; inability to produce supporting evidence at the time did not constitute inability in law to set up the counter-claim, so the affidavit did not meet the requirements of s.41(7) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- There be no deemed extension of time to comply with the requirements of the bankruptcy notice.
- The application under s.41(7) be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment