R v Greenfield [2023] NSWSC 1386
The application for a pre-trial Basha inquiry to cross-examine seven witnesses was refused in relation to five of them because the accused did not meet the high threshold of demonstrating a serious risk of unfairness at trial; for two witnesses, Brett Lucas and Shayne Miller, the Court found potential for prejudice if pre-trial questioning was not allowed and granted their attendance for limited inquiries.
- Parties
- Crown: Rex; Accused: Stephen Greenfield
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Pre Trial (basha Inquiry Application)
- Outcome
- Partly granted (Basha inquiry ordered for Brett Lucas and Shayne Miller; refused as to other requested witnesses)
- Legal Topics
- Basha Inquiry, Committal Procedure, Application to Cross Examine Witnesses Prior to Trial, Prejudice and Unfair Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Crown
Stephen Greenfield
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial (basha Inquiry Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be granted a pre-trial Basha inquiry to cross-examine certain witnesses
- 2 Whether refusal to permit such inquiry would result in unfairness to the accused's trial
Ratio Decidendi
The application for a pre-trial Basha inquiry to cross-examine seven witnesses was refused in relation to five of them because the accused did not meet the high threshold of demonstrating a serious risk of unfairness at trial; for two witnesses, Brett Lucas and Shayne Miller, the Court found potential for prejudice if pre-trial questioning was not allowed and granted their attendance for limited inquiries.
Court Disposition
Partly granted (Basha inquiry ordered for Brett Lucas and Shayne Miller; refused as to other requested witnesses)
Orders
- Brett Lucas and Shayne Miller are to attend Court on 21 November 2023 to give evidence at a preliminary hearing held in advance of the trial concerning matters identified in these reasons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment