In the matter of Waterfront Investments Group Pty Limited (in liquidation) [2015] NSWSC 245

In the matter of Waterfront Investments Group Pty Limited (in liquidation) [2015] NSWSC 245

Plaintiffs established breaches of fiduciary and statutory duty by the Sixth Defendant and knowing assistance by the First and Fifth Defendants; appropriate relief included declarations, equitable lien, and monetary orders. Costs were to be generally awarded to the successful party as against unsuccessful parties, but Plaintiffs' and Defendants' partial successes warranted tailored costs orders, with the Plaintiffs' costs of unsuccessful expert reports excluded.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 March 2015
Procedural Posture
Corporations – Equity – Liquidation – Breach of Duty – Costs / Post Trial, Application for Final Orders and Costs
Outcome
Declarations in favour of Plaintiffs; monetary and costs orders made in favour of and against various parties as set out in the orders.
Legal Topics
['breach of Fiduciary Duties' "directors' Duties" 'knowing Assistance' 'equitable Lien' 'uncommercial Transactions' 'costs']
['corporations Law' 'equity' 'civil Procedure'] ['breach of Fiduciary Duties' "directors' Duties" 'knowing Assistance' 'equitable Lien' 'uncommercial Transactions' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Corporations – Equity – Liquidation – Breach of Duty – Costs / Post Trial, Application for Final Orders and Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Sixth Defendant breached fiduciary and statutory duties owed to the Second Plaintiff' 'Whether monetary transfers to the Fifth Defendant constituted breaches of duty' 'Whether the First and Fifth Defendants knowingly assisted breaches of duty' 'Whether equitable lien is established in favour of the Second Plaintiff' 'Appropriate orders as to costs where Plaintiffs succeeded against some but not all Defendants']

Ratio Decidendi

Plaintiffs established breaches of fiduciary and statutory duty by the Sixth Defendant and knowing assistance by the First and Fifth Defendants; appropriate relief included declarations, equitable lien, and monetary orders. Costs were to be generally awarded to the successful party as against unsuccessful parties, but Plaintiffs' and Defendants' partial successes warranted tailored costs orders, with the Plaintiffs' costs of unsuccessful expert reports excluded.

Court Disposition

Declarations in favour of Plaintiffs; monetary and costs orders made in favour of and against various parties as set out in the orders.

Orders

  • ['Declare that the First Defendant holds title to Lot 102, Deposited Plan 1124621 subject to an equitable lien in favour of the Second Plaintiff in the amount of $482,441.43.' 'Declare that the Sixth Defendant breached fiduciary duties and statutory duties under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by procuring the...