Firmtech Aluminium Pty Ltd v Xie; Zhang v Xu; Xie v Auschn Conveyancing & Associates Pty Ltd (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 1427

Firmtech Aluminium Pty Ltd v Xie; Zhang v Xu; Xie v Auschn Conveyancing & Associates Pty Ltd (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 1427

The Plaintiffs are not required to elect between an account of profits or equitable compensation until after further evidentiary steps are completed, including supplementary expert reports, to ensure their election is informed. Appointment of Mr Xu as director of Firmtech is appropriate given the continuing effect of past oppressive conduct, notwithstanding risk of deadlock, as the company is dormant and only disposition of judgment funds is at issue. Certain interlocutory orders for document retention remain in force to facilitate possible future accounting. In the Panania Proceeding, pre-judgment interest is to run from the date of demand, not sale completion, because of Plaintiff's...

Parties
First Plaintiff: Firmtech Aluminium Pty Ltd; Second Plaintiff: Zhaohui Xu; First Defendant: Xiaoyan Xie; Second Defendant: Jiamin Zhang; Third Defendant: Firmtech Aluminum Pty Ltd; Fourth Defendant: Logikal Façade Solutions Pty Ltd; First Plaintiff: Jiamin Zhang; First Defendant: Zhaohui Xu; Second Defendant: Auschn Conveyancing & Associates Pty Ltd; Third Defendant: Firmtech Holdings Pty Ltd; Fourth Defendant: Hui Gao; Fifth Defendant: Firmtech Aluminium Windows and Doors Pty Ltd; First Plaintiff: Xiaoyan Xie; First Defendant: Auschn Conveyancing & Associates Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Auschn Global Group Pty Ltd; Third Defendant: Zhaohui Xu
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 November 2024
Procedural Posture
Equity Corporations List / Consequential Orders Following Primary Judgment; Directions for Further Evidence and Determination of Remaining Issues, With Some Final Orders Including Monetary Judgment
Outcome
Directions and interlocutory orders; monetary judgment entered for cross-claimant in Panania Proceeding; appointment of Mr Xu as director of Firmtech; leave for further quantum evidence and deferred election on relief; partial dismissal of certain claims; costs reserved.
Legal Topics
Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Statutory Duties of Directors and Officers, Election Between Account of Profits and Equitable Compensation, Oppression Remedy, Consequential Orders, Remedies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Firmtech Aluminium Pty Ltd

First Plaintiff

Zhaohui Xu

Second Plaintiff

Xiaoyan Xie

First Defendant

Jiamin Zhang

Second Defendant

Firmtech Aluminum Pty Ltd

Third Defendant

Logikal Façade Solutions Pty Ltd

Fourth Defendant

Jiamin Zhang

First Plaintiff

Zhaohui Xu

First Defendant

Auschn Conveyancing & Associates Pty Ltd

Second Defendant

Firmtech Holdings Pty Ltd

Third Defendant

Hui Gao

Fourth Defendant

Firmtech Aluminium Windows and Doors Pty Ltd

Fifth Defendant

Xiaoyan Xie

First Plaintiff

Auschn Conveyancing & Associates Pty Ltd

First Defendant

Auschn Global Group Pty Ltd

Second Defendant

Zhaohui Xu

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Equity Corporations List / Consequential Orders Following Primary Judgment; Directions for Further Evidence and Determination of Remaining Issues, With Some Final Orders Including Monetary Judgment

  1. 1 Timing and process for election between account of profits and equitable compensation for breach of statutory/fiduciary duties
  2. 2 Consequential relief under section 233 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for oppression
  3. 3 Whether interlocutory record-keeping orders should be discharged

Ratio Decidendi

The Plaintiffs are not required to elect between an account of profits or equitable compensation until after further evidentiary steps are completed, including supplementary expert reports, to ensure their election is informed. Appointment of Mr Xu as director of Firmtech is appropriate given the continuing effect of past oppressive conduct, notwithstanding risk of deadlock, as the company is dormant and only disposition of judgment funds is at issue. Certain interlocutory orders for document retention remain in force to facilitate possible future accounting. In the Panania Proceeding, pre-judgment interest is to run from the date of demand, not sale completion, because of Plaintiff's...

Court Disposition

Directions and interlocutory orders; monetary judgment entered for cross-claimant in Panania Proceeding; appointment of Mr Xu as director of Firmtech; leave for further quantum evidence and deferred election on relief; partial dismissal of certain claims; costs reserved.

Orders

  • Zhaohui Xu appointed as director of Firmtech Aluminium Pty Ltd under s 233(1)(j) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
  • Directions for requests, responses and applications for disclosure, and timetable for supplementary expert evidence in Principal Proceeding.