Smith v McKeough [1953] HCA 43

Smith v McKeough [1953] HCA 43

The appeal was dismissed because the Full Supreme Court was entitled under its appellate powers to infer that the plaintiff had promised to marry the defendant and was ready and willing to marry him at all material times. Those inferences were not inconsistent with the jury's finding that the defendant promised to marry the plaintiff; on the evidence they were the only reasonable findings, and the omitted matters were not real or substantial live issues at trial.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Action for Breach of Promise of Marriage / Appeal to the High Court of Australia From an Order of the Full Supreme Court of Queensland Dismissing the Defendant's Appeal From Judgment for the Plaintiff
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['breach of Promise of Marriage' 'jury Findings' 'appellate Power to Draw Inferences of Fact' 'readiness and Willingness to Marry' 'decree Nisi and Capacity to Promise Marriage']
['contract' 'civil Procedure' 'family Law'] ['breach of Promise of Marriage' 'jury Findings' 'appellate Power to Draw Inferences of Fact' 'readiness and Willingness to Marry' 'decree Nisi and Capacity to Promise Marriage']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Action for Breach of Promise of Marriage / Appeal to the High Court of Australia From an Order of the Full Supreme Court of Queensland Dismissing the Defendant's Appeal From Judgment for the Plaintiff

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff had proved the essential elements of breach of promise of marriage not expressly submitted to the jury: that she promised to marry the defendant and remained ready and willing to do so at all material times.' "Whether the Full Supreme Court of Queensland had power on appeal under O. LXX rr. 11 and 26 to draw inferences of fact not inconsistent with the jury's findings." 'Whether those inferences should be drawn where the omitted issues were not real or substantial live issues at trial.']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the Full Supreme Court was entitled under its appellate powers to infer that the plaintiff had promised to marry the defendant and was ready and willing to marry him at all material times. Those inferences were not inconsistent with the jury's finding that the defendant promised to marry the plaintiff; on the evidence they were the only reasonable findings, and the omitted matters were not real or substantial live issues at trial.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']