Driscoll v J Scott Pty Ltd

Driscoll v J Scott Pty Ltd

The raised planks on trestles on which the appellant worked were a working platform, and the absence of a guardrail breached reg 16 (iv); the trial judge's finding that a guard or rail would probably have prevented the fall established causation. The breach supported a private claim for damages and also evidenced and constituted a failure by the employer to take reasonable care to provide a safe system and safe place of work. No basis was shown for disturbing the trial judge's damages assessment, so judgment was entered for the appellant for $106,023.27 and the cross-appeal was dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Claim for Damages Arising From an Industrial Accident / Appeal From Judgment of the Supreme Court of Queensland and Cross Appeal on Damages
Outcome
Appeal allowed with costs; cross-appeal dismissed with costs; judgment entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $106,023.27 with costs.
Legal Topics
['breach of Statutory Duty' "employer's Duty of Care" 'safe System of Work' 'safe Place of Work' 'scaffolding and Working Platforms' 'personal Injury Damages']
['tort Law' 'employment Law' 'occupational Health and Safety'] ['breach of Statutory Duty' "employer's Duty of Care" 'safe System of Work' 'safe Place of Work' 'scaffolding and Working Platforms' 'personal Injury Damages']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Claim for Damages Arising From an Industrial Accident / Appeal From Judgment of the Supreme Court of Queensland and Cross Appeal on Damages

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the raised planks on trestles used by the appellant were scaffolding or a working platform within the meaning of reg 16 (iv) of the regulations under the Inspection of Scaffolding Acts, 1915 to 1966 Q.' "Whether the absence of a guardrail was a breach of statutory duty that caused the appellant's fall and injuries." 'Whether breach of reg 16 (iv) gave rise to a private cause of action for damages.' 'Whether the respondent employer was negligent in failing to provide a safe system and safe place of work.' "Whether the trial judge's assessment of damages at $106,023.27 should be disturbed on the cross-appeal."]

Ratio Decidendi

The raised planks on trestles on which the appellant worked were a working platform, and the absence of a guardrail breached reg 16 (iv); the trial judge's finding that a guard or rail would probably have prevented the fall established causation. The breach supported a private claim for damages and also evidenced and constituted a failure by the employer to take reasonable care to provide a safe system and safe place of work. No basis was shown for disturbing the trial judge's damages assessment, so judgment was entered for the appellant for $106,023.27 and the cross-appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed with costs; cross-appeal dismissed with costs; judgment entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $106,023.27 with costs.

Orders

  • ['Appeal allowed with costs and cross-appeal dismissed with costs.' 'Order of Dunn J. set aside.' 'In lieu thereof order that judgment be entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $106,023.27, with costs.']