R v Colvin [2021] NSWDC 390
The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused broke and entered the complainant's dwelling by exiting and re-entering through the window, and committed the serious indictable offence of intimidation, knowing persons were present. The complainant's evidence, corroborated by early reports, evidence of a damaged window screen, and the accused's own admissions and letters, established each element of the offence.
- Parties
- Accused: Jason Keith Colvin; Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judge Alone Trial, Verdict
- Outcome
- Guilty
- Legal Topics
- Break and Enter, Intimidation, Serious Indictable Offence, Criminal Procedure, Onus of Proof, Assessment of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jason Keith Colvin
Accused
Director of Public Prosecutions
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judge Alone Trial, Verdict
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused broke and entered the dwelling
- 2 Whether the accused committed the serious indictable offence of intimidation while knowing others were present
- 3 Whether the prosecution proved each element beyond reasonable doubt
Ratio Decidendi
The prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused broke and entered the complainant's dwelling by exiting and re-entering through the window, and committed the serious indictable offence of intimidation, knowing persons were present. The complainant's evidence, corroborated by early reports, evidence of a damaged window screen, and the accused's own admissions and letters, established each element of the offence.
Court Disposition
Guilty
Orders
- The accused is convicted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment