R v Abdel-Aziz [2018] NSWDC 468
Given the offender's guilty plea, youth, lack of significant prior convictions, low objective seriousness of the offence, social disadvantage, psychological vulnerabilities, and prospects for rehabilitation, a sentence of two years to be served by way of an intensive corrections order is appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Convicted; sentenced to two years' imprisonment to be served by way of intensive corrections order.
- Legal Topics
- ['break and Enter' 'aggravated Burglary' 'joint Criminal Enterprise' 'sentencing' 'intensive Corrections Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for an aggravated break and enter involving a young offender with prior good character?' 'How do parity, objective seriousness, and personal circumstances affect sentencing in this case?']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the offender's guilty plea, youth, lack of significant prior convictions, low objective seriousness of the offence, social disadvantage, psychological vulnerabilities, and prospects for rehabilitation, a sentence of two years to be served by way of an intensive corrections order is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Convicted; sentenced to two years' imprisonment to be served by way of intensive corrections order.
Orders
- ['Conviction entered for aggravated break and enter and larceny.' "Sentenced to two years' imprisonment to be served by way of an intensive corrections order commencing 12 October 2018." 'Must report to Community Corrections Office at Bankstown within 48 hours of release from custody.' 'Must not commit any further...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment