R v O’Hara [2019] NSWDC 812
Because the break, enter and steal offences were mid-range offending involving planning, substantial stolen property, damage, financial gain and commission while on conditional liberty, and because the domestic violence intimidation offence fell below the mid-range, full-time imprisonment was required. The guilty pleas, remorse, positive rehabilitation prospects, onerous custody in protection and need for community supervision justified a 25% discount and special circumstances. Applying totality to the existing sentences, the sentence was not commenced at arrest or at the end of the current non-parole period, but was backdated to 5 April 2019. An aggregate sentence of six years with a...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Sentence After Guilty Pleas, Form 1 Matters Taken Into Account, and Offender's Request to Be Sentenced on a S166 Certificate Matter
- Outcome
- Offender convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of six years imprisonment commencing 5 April 2019, with a non-parole period of three years and nine months expiring 4 January 2023 and head sentence expiring 4 April 2025.
- Legal Topics
- ['break, Enter and Steal' 'stalk or Intimidate Intending to Cause Fear of Physical or Mental Harm' 'domestic Violence Offence' 'aggregate Sentence' 'form 1 Offences' 'commencement Date' 'totality' 'special Circumstances' 'drug Addiction and Sentencing' 'guilty Plea Discount']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentence After Guilty Pleas, Form 1 Matters Taken Into Account, and Offender's Request to Be Sentenced on a S166 Certificate Matter
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for five counts of break, enter and steal, one domestic violence stalk or intimidate offence, and one goods suspected of being stolen offence on a s166 certificate.' 'How the Form 1 offences should be taken into account in sentencing for the principal offences.' 'Whether an aggregate sentence of imprisonment was required and whether any alternative to full-time custody was appropriate.' 'What commencement date should be fixed having regard to existing sentences and the principle of totality.' 'Whether special circumstances justified a longer period of supervision in the community.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the break, enter and steal offences were mid-range offending involving planning, substantial stolen property, damage, financial gain and commission while on conditional liberty, and because the domestic violence intimidation offence fell below the mid-range, full-time imprisonment was required. The guilty pleas, remorse, positive rehabilitation prospects, onerous custody in protection and need for community supervision justified a 25% discount and special circumstances. Applying totality to the existing sentences, the sentence was not commenced at arrest or at the end of the current non-parole period, but was backdated to 5 April 2019. An aggregate sentence of six years with a...
Court Disposition
Offender convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of six years imprisonment commencing 5 April 2019, with a non-parole period of three years and nine months expiring 4 January 2023 and head sentence expiring 4 April 2025.
Orders
- ['The Offender is convicted of Count 1, break, enter and steal, value less than $60,000, in breach of s112(1)(a) of the Crimes Act.' 'The Offender is convicted of Count 2, break, enter and steal, value less than $60,000, in breach of s112(1)(a) of the Crimes Act.' 'The Offender is convicted of Count 3, break, enter...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment