R v Handsaker [2016] NSWDC 304
The offender committed serious planned offences involving the theft of multiple firearms and repeated attempts to dissuade a witness from giving evidence, and also possessed an unauthorised firearm. The court was not satisfied that the theft was motivated solely by anger at the offender's father or any plan to destroy the firearms. Full-time custody was required, with general deterrence, personal deterrence, guilty pleas, assistance in recovering firearms, the offender's background, drug use, uncertain rehabilitation prospects and special circumstances taken into account. An aggregate sentence of 5 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2.5 years was imposed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Sentence
- Outcome
- The offender was sentenced to an aggregate sentence of imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of 2.5 years with a head sentence of 5 years, with Form 1 matters taken into account.
- Legal Topics
- ['break Enter and Steal' 'do an Act With Intent to Influence Witness' 'possess Unauthorised Firearm' 'form 1' 's 166 Certificate' 'general Deterrence' 'special Circumstances' 'assistance to Authorities' 'guilty Plea Discount']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What aggregate sentence should be imposed for break, enter and steal involving firearms and doing an act with intent to influence a witness, with Form 1 matters taken into account.' 'What sentence should be imposed for possessing an unauthorised firearm dealt with on a s 166 certificate.' 'Whether the offender established that his motivation in stealing the firearms was simply to destroy them to get back at his father.' "What allowance should be made for the offender's guilty pleas, assistance to authorities, remorse, background, drug use, rehabilitation prospects and need for deterrence." 'Whether special circumstances should be found to allow an extended period of parole supervision.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender committed serious planned offences involving the theft of multiple firearms and repeated attempts to dissuade a witness from giving evidence, and also possessed an unauthorised firearm. The court was not satisfied that the theft was motivated solely by anger at the offender's father or any plan to destroy the firearms. Full-time custody was required, with general deterrence, personal deterrence, guilty pleas, assistance in recovering firearms, the offender's background, drug use, uncertain rehabilitation prospects and special circumstances taken into account. An aggregate sentence of 5 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2.5 years was imposed.
Court Disposition
The offender was sentenced to an aggregate sentence of imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of 2.5 years with a head sentence of 5 years, with Form 1 matters taken into account.
Orders
- ['An aggregate sentence was imposed consisting of a non-parole period of 2.5 years and a head sentence of 5 years.' 'The sentence was to date from 22 November 2015.' 'The non-parole period was to expire on 21 May 2018, on which day the offender was eligible to be released to parole.' 'A finding of special...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment