DURIAN PTY LTD v PENRITH CITY COUNCIL [1991] NSWCA 85
The contractor is entitled to the lump sum price agreed under the contract. CL11 adjustments require a valid direction from the Superintendent which did not occur before practical completion. No implied term operates to reduce the lump sum for overlap or absence of work under items 4-9.
- Parties
- Appellant/contractor: Durian Pty Ltd; Respondent/principal: Penrith City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 September 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Common Law Division / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Building Contracts, Lump Sum Contracts, Schedule of Prices, Variation Provisions, Implied Terms
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Durian Pty Ltd
Appellant/contractor
Penrith City Council
Respondent/principal
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Common Law Division / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the contractor is entitled to certain amounts under items 4-9 of the Schedule of Prices in a building contract.
- 2 Proper construction and application of CL11 of the General Conditions of Contract relating to adjustments for provisional sums and quantities.
- 3 Whether a direction was validly given by the Superintendent to trigger adjustment provisions under CL11.
Ratio Decidendi
The contractor is entitled to the lump sum price agreed under the contract. CL11 adjustments require a valid direction from the Superintendent which did not occur before practical completion. No implied term operates to reduce the lump sum for overlap or absence of work under items 4-9.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Appeal upheld with costs.
- Parties to bring in short minutes to give effect to conclusions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment