Belmore Property Co (Pty) Ltd v Allen [1950] HCA 5
Section 41 prohibits prohibition or certiorari only after a determination is made by the Fair Rents Board; prior to a determination, such proceedings may lie. However, since the building lease and the premises in question are within the operation of the Act, and the Board has jurisdiction to increase rent, there is no reason to grant special leave to appeal.
- Parties
- Applicants: Belmore Property Company (Proprietary) Limited and another; Respondents: Allen and another
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Special Leave to Appeal / Application for Special Leave to Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales (full Court)
- Outcome
- application for special leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Building Lease, Jurisdiction of Fair Rents Board, Prohibition, Fair Rent Determination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Belmore Property Company (Proprietary) Limited and another
Applicants
Allen and another
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Application for Special Leave to Appeal / Application for Special Leave to Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales (full Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s. 41 of the Landlord and Tenant (Amendment) Act 1948-1949 precluded prohibition before a determination by a Fair Rents Board
- 2 Whether a building erected under a building lease is within the Act's operation
- 3 Whether the Fair Rents Board has jurisdiction to increase rent
Ratio Decidendi
Section 41 prohibits prohibition or certiorari only after a determination is made by the Fair Rents Board; prior to a determination, such proceedings may lie. However, since the building lease and the premises in question are within the operation of the Act, and the Board has jurisdiction to increase rent, there is no reason to grant special leave to appeal.
Court Disposition
application for special leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for special leave to appeal refused.
- Applicants to pay the costs of the respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment