Wood v Inglis [2009] NSWSC 313
The financial statements are admissible business records under s 69 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) as Mr Tierney, the external accountant, could reasonably be supposed to have made the entries either from his own knowledge or information provided by Dr Inglis, who had such knowledge. It would defeat s 69(2) to limit their use, and the potential for other evidence to contradict their contents is not a ground for exclusion or limitation under s 136.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Cross Claim / Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence
- Outcome
- Documents admitted for all purposes.
- Legal Topics
- ['business Records' 'hearsay' 'admissibility of Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Cross Claim / Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the financial statements of the Inglis Research Trust are admissible as business records under Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 69' 'Whether a limiting order under Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 136, should be made so that the documents are not evidence of the truth of the previous representations']
Ratio Decidendi
The financial statements are admissible business records under s 69 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) as Mr Tierney, the external accountant, could reasonably be supposed to have made the entries either from his own knowledge or information provided by Dr Inglis, who had such knowledge. It would defeat s 69(2) to limit their use, and the potential for other evidence to contradict their contents is not a ground for exclusion or limitation under s 136.
Court Disposition
Documents admitted for all purposes.
Orders
- ['The financial statements of the Trust are admitted as evidence with no order under s 136 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment