NATIONWIDE NEWS PTY. LIMITED v. CARMICHAEL & OTHERS [2005] NSWCA 56
Given the prominence of the second headline, its conjunction with the first headline, the juxtaposition of the opponents' group photograph with the District Court defendant's photograph, and the limited basis of the article's reporting, the trial judge did not err in holding that the article was capable of carrying the pleaded imputations and that it was for the jury to decide whether the imputations were in fact conveyed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal in Defamation Proceedings / Leave to Appeal Against Nicholas J's Order That the Newspaper Article Was Capable of Carrying the Pleaded Imputations
- Outcome
- Leave refused with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['capacity to Convey Defamatory Imputation' 'reporting of Court Proceedings' 'ordinary Reasonable Reader' 'headlines and Article Layout' 'strike Out of Imputations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal in Defamation Proceedings / Leave to Appeal Against Nicholas J's Order That the Newspaper Article Was Capable of Carrying the Pleaded Imputations
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Daily Telegraph article was capable of conveying imputations that the opponents colluded with neighbours in a poisoning claim scam to get rich.' 'Whether the article, read as a whole, was merely a neutral report of court proceedings or was capable of conveying an imputation of guilt.' 'Whether the prominence, wording and layout of the headlines and photographs affected the defamatory meaning conveyed.']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the prominence of the second headline, its conjunction with the first headline, the juxtaposition of the opponents' group photograph with the District Court defendant's photograph, and the limited basis of the article's reporting, the trial judge did not err in holding that the article was capable of carrying the pleaded imputations and that it was for the jury to decide whether the imputations were in fact conveyed.
Court Disposition
Leave refused with costs.
Orders
- ['The application is refused with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment