Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Bingo Industries Pty Ltd; Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Tartak [2024] FCA 121

Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Bingo Industries Pty Ltd; Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Tartak [2024] FCA 121

Cartel offences committed by a large public company and its chief executive officer, involving deliberate, covert conduct in substantial Sydney waste management markets, are objectively very serious and warrant condign sentences. Penalties must reflect the objective seriousness, the role of senior officers, lack of prior corporate compliance, and the need for deterrence. Substantial fines were imposed on Bingo; imprisonment, intensive correction orders, fines, and disqualification were imposed on Mr Tartak, with appropriate discounts for early pleas and cooperation, moderated by the totality and parity principles.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 February 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing Judgment
Outcome
Convictions entered and sentences imposed
Legal Topics
['cartel Offences' 'sentencing Principles' 'disqualification Order' 'general Deterrence' 'totality Principle' 'parity Principle']
['criminal Law' 'competition Law' 'corporate Law'] ['cartel Offences' 'sentencing Principles' 'disqualification Order' 'general Deterrence' 'totality Principle' 'parity Principle']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for cartel conduct under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)?' 'What discounts for mitigating factors, including plea and cooperation, apply?' 'Is a disqualification order warranted under s 86E of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)?']

Ratio Decidendi

Cartel offences committed by a large public company and its chief executive officer, involving deliberate, covert conduct in substantial Sydney waste management markets, are objectively very serious and warrant condign sentences. Penalties must reflect the objective seriousness, the role of senior officers, lack of prior corporate compliance, and the need for deterrence. Substantial fines were imposed on Bingo; imprisonment, intensive correction orders, fines, and disqualification were imposed on Mr Tartak, with appropriate discounts for early pleas and cooperation, moderated by the totality and parity principles.

Court Disposition

Convictions entered and sentences imposed

Orders

  • ['Bingo Industries Pty Limited convicted of cartel offences under ss 45AF(1) and 45AG(1) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth); fined $15,000,000 for each offence, aggregate fine $30,000,000.' "Daniel Charbel Tartak convicted for aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring cartel offences; sentenced to two...