NSW Land & Housing Corporation v Dia [2012] NSWCA 321

NSW Land & Housing Corporation v Dia [2012] NSWCA 321

The appeal failed because Mr Bailey's evidence did not establish any incontrovertible fact or compelling inference showing that the plaintiff could not have fallen in the manner accepted by the primary judge. Mr Bailey lacked demonstrated expertise to rely on the nature of the injuries as excluding the plaintiff's account, and he did not adequately address the dynamic scenario described by Mr Cowling, in which the plaintiff was moving quickly, leaning forward and looking over the railing when the capping dislodged. The primary judge had a sound basis to prefer Mr Cowling's evidence, so the finding that the defective capping materially contributed to and was a necessary condition of the...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 October 2012
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal; Appeal in Negligence Proceedings / Court of Appeal From a District Court Liability Only Interlocutory Judgment
Outcome
Time extended, leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['causation' "occupiers' Liability" 'defective Stair Railing Capping' 'expert Evidence' 'appellate Review of Factual Findings']
['torts' 'negligence'] ['causation' "occupiers' Liability" 'defective Stair Railing Capping' 'expert Evidence' 'appellate Review of Factual Findings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal; Appeal in Negligence Proceedings / Court of Appeal From a District Court Liability Only Interlocutory Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether time should be extended for the Corporation to file an application for leave to appeal and whether leave should be granted.' "Whether the primary judge erred in finding that the Corporation's breach of duty caused the plaintiff's fall and injuries." 'Whether the primary judge erred in preferring the evidence of Mr Cowling over the evidence of Mr Bailey.' "Whether the primary judge's findings were inconsistent with incontrovertible facts, glaringly improbable or contrary to compelling inferences."]

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal failed because Mr Bailey's evidence did not establish any incontrovertible fact or compelling inference showing that the plaintiff could not have fallen in the manner accepted by the primary judge. Mr Bailey lacked demonstrated expertise to rely on the nature of the injuries as excluding the plaintiff's account, and he did not adequately address the dynamic scenario described by Mr Cowling, in which the plaintiff was moving quickly, leaning forward and looking over the railing when the capping dislodged. The primary judge had a sound basis to prefer Mr Cowling's evidence, so the finding that the defective capping materially contributed to and was a necessary condition of the...

Court Disposition

Time extended, leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Extend the time for the Corporation to file an application for leave to appeal.' 'Grant leave to appeal.' 'Dismiss the appeal.' "Order the Corporation to pay the plaintiff's costs of the appeal."]