Wheeler v Baldwin [1934] HCA 58
A person in possession of land, even absent a statutory possessory title, is entitled to lodge a caveat and challenge, on specified grounds, the validity of an applicant's documentary title in proceedings to bring land under the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW). The court should direct an issue whether impugned conveyances relied on by the applicant are void under the Pretenced Titles Act 1540, provided the caveatrix specifically identifies the conveyances and grounds of challenge.
- Parties
- Appellant/caveatrix: Alice Ann Wheeler; Respondent/applicant: Louisa Ann Baldwin; Defendant (not Appearing): Registrar-General for New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Order of Supreme Court of New South Wales to High Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Caveats, Adverse Possession, Title to Land, Pretenced Titles Act 1540, Real Property Act 1900 (nsw), Issues on Documentary and Possessory Title
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alice Ann Wheeler
Appellant/caveatrix
Louisa Ann Baldwin
Respondent/applicant
Registrar-General for New South Wales
Defendant (not Appearing)
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Order of Supreme Court of New South Wales to High Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a caveatrix in possession is entitled to challenge the applicant’s documentary title in proceedings to bring land under the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW)
- 2 Whether the court should direct an issue whether certain conveyances relied on by the applicant were void as conveyances of pretenced titles under 32 Hen. VIII., c. 9 (Pretenced Titles Act 1540)
Ratio Decidendi
A person in possession of land, even absent a statutory possessory title, is entitled to lodge a caveat and challenge, on specified grounds, the validity of an applicant's documentary title in proceedings to bring land under the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW). The court should direct an issue whether impugned conveyances relied on by the applicant are void under the Pretenced Titles Act 1540, provided the caveatrix specifically identifies the conveyances and grounds of challenge.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs
Orders
- Order of Street J. varied to add an issue: Whether, as against the plaintiff and her predecessors, the conveyances of 20 May 1903, 24 July 1911, and 14 November 1911 (as specified), were void as conveyances of pretenced titles under the Pretenced Titles Act 1540.
- Direction that the caveatrix (Wheeler) be plaintiff on all issues.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment