R v Sigalla (No. 4) [2016] NSWSC 1920
The material for which the accused sought a certificate concerned matters relevant to whether he was dishonest in making or causing payments from TZ Limited to himself or others, which was a principal issue in the case, and therefore fell within s 128(10)(b) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW). The application for a certificate under s 128 was refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Law Procedural Ruling / Accused's Application for a Certificate Under S 128 of the Evidence Act 1995 (nsw)
- Outcome
- Accused's application for a certificate under s 128 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['certificate Under S 128 of the Evidence Act 1995 (nsw)' 'evidence by Defendant' 'self Incrimination' 'facts in Issue']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Law Procedural Ruling / Accused's Application for a Certificate Under S 128 of the Evidence Act 1995 (nsw)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the accused should be granted a certificate under s 128 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) in respect of past evidence and evidence apprehended to be elicited in cross-examination.' 'Whether the material in respect of which the certificate was sought fell within s 128(10)(b) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).']
Ratio Decidendi
The material for which the accused sought a certificate concerned matters relevant to whether he was dishonest in making or causing payments from TZ Limited to himself or others, which was a principal issue in the case, and therefore fell within s 128(10)(b) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW). The application for a certificate under s 128 was refused.
Court Disposition
Accused's application for a certificate under s 128 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) refused.
Orders
- ["The accused's application for a certificate under s 128 is refused."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment