NITIVA v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS & ORS [1999] NSWCA 272
Because the first opponent agreed that orders 1 to 3 in the summons should be made and the claimant was subject to a custodial sentence, the Court made the orders sought, amended order 1 to quash the orders and conviction, discharged the claimant from bail, and made no order as to costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Summons Seeking Orders in the Nature of Certiorari and Remittance of Proceedings to the Local Court / Court of Appeal Orders Made on Summons; Reasons Reserved to Be Delivered Later
- Outcome
- Orders 1 to 3 in the summons made; claimant discharged from bail; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['certiorari' 'remittance to Local Court' 'bail' 'costs' 'quashing Conviction and Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Summons Seeking Orders in the Nature of Certiorari and Remittance of Proceedings to the Local Court / Court of Appeal Orders Made on Summons; Reasons Reserved to Be Delivered Later
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether orders in the nature of certiorari should be made against the District Court and a Magistrate of the Local Court.' 'Whether the proceedings should be returned to the Local Court so that the information against the claimant may be dealt with according to law.' 'Whether the claimant should be discharged from bail and what order should be made as to costs.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the first opponent agreed that orders 1 to 3 in the summons should be made and the claimant was subject to a custodial sentence, the Court made the orders sought, amended order 1 to quash the orders and conviction, discharged the claimant from bail, and made no order as to costs.
Court Disposition
Orders 1 to 3 in the summons made; claimant discharged from bail; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['Orders 1 to 3 in the summons made.' 'Order 1 amended by adding the words "and conviction" after "Orders" on the second last line, so that the orders and conviction made by Naughten DCJ are quashed.' 'The claimant is discharged from his bail.' 'No order as to costs.' 'The question of any further orders reserved...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment