Auschem Pacific Group Pty Ltd v Tismor Health & Wellness Pty Limited [2019] FCA 1216
The balance of convenience between the parties regarding venue is finely balanced and does not sufficiently warrant positive action to change the status quo; thus, the proceeding should remain in the Victoria District Registry.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Dispute (contract) / Interlocutory Application to Transfer Proceedings; Ruling on Venue
- Outcome
- Application to transfer proceedings dismissed; costs awarded to applicant.
- Legal Topics
- ['change of Venue' 'case Management' 'contract Dispute' 'interlocutory Application']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Commercial Dispute (contract) / Interlocutory Application to Transfer Proceedings; Ruling on Venue
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether proceedings should be transferred from Victoria District Registry to New South Wales District Registry pursuant to s 48 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)' 'Whether the balance of convenience favours transfer']
Ratio Decidendi
The balance of convenience between the parties regarding venue is finely balanced and does not sufficiently warrant positive action to change the status quo; thus, the proceeding should remain in the Victoria District Registry.
Court Disposition
Application to transfer proceedings dismissed; costs awarded to applicant.
Orders
- ["The Respondent/Cross-Claimant's interlocutory application dated 21 May 2019 be dismissed." "The Respondent/Cross-Claimant shall pay the Applicant/Cross-Respondent's costs of responding to the Interlocutory Application on a standard basis, at an amount to be agreed or in absence of agreement to be taxed forthwith."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment