R v Hines (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 990
Given the agreement of both parties, the status of the witness as a child, and counsel's indication that the accused is not prejudiced (and may gain a forensic advantage), it is appropriate to grant the order under s 26(a) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) for the child witness's evidence to be given by recorded interview and closed-circuit television.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Procedural and Other Rulings
- Outcome
- Order made under s 26(a) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) for the child witness's questioning via recorded interview and balance of evidence by closed-circuit television.
- Legal Topics
- ['child Witness' 'recorded Interview' 'closed Circuit Television' 'control of Questioning']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural and Other Rulings
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court should order that the child witness's evidence be given by way of a recorded interview and by closed-circuit television pursuant to s 26(a) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)"]
Ratio Decidendi
Given the agreement of both parties, the status of the witness as a child, and counsel's indication that the accused is not prejudiced (and may gain a forensic advantage), it is appropriate to grant the order under s 26(a) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) for the child witness's evidence to be given by recorded interview and closed-circuit television.
Court Disposition
Order made under s 26(a) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) for the child witness's questioning via recorded interview and balance of evidence by closed-circuit television.
Orders
- ['The witness, SJ, is to be questioned by playing the recorded interview made 5 March 2013.' 'The balance of the evidence is to be given by closed-circuit television.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment