Police v Sidney Lee Burchett [2011] NSWLC 15
The offender's guilty pleas warranted a 20% discount, but the offences required full-time imprisonment because of their objective seriousness, the exploitative nature of child pornography offences, and the need for general deterrence and denunciation. The dissemination offence, involving internet chat logs over a lengthy period in a network of like-minded participants, fell below the halfway mark of objective seriousness and initially warranted about three and a half years. Each possession offence, involving 192 items across two computers including level 4 and level 5 material, fell between the low end and halfway mark and initially warranted about two and a half years. Having regard to...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing for Disseminating Child Pornography and Possessing Child Pornography Contrary to S 91 H(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 (nsw) / Sentence After Pleas of Guilty in the Local Court
- Outcome
- The offender was convicted on all three sequences and sentenced to imprisonment. The overall effect was a 17-month non-parole period, with the earliest date of release being 26 October 2012, followed by supervision on parole.
- Legal Topics
- ['child Pornography' 'child Abuse Material' 'dissemination of Child Pornography' 'possession of Child Pornography' 'guilty Plea Discount' 'objective Seriousness' 'general Deterrence' 'denunciation' 'totality Principle' 'non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Disseminating Child Pornography and Possessing Child Pornography Contrary to S 91 H(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 (nsw) / Sentence After Pleas of Guilty in the Local Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentences should be imposed for one count of disseminating child pornography and two counts of possessing child pornography.' "What discount should be allowed for the offender's delayed pleas of guilty following charge negotiations." 'How the objective seriousness of the dissemination and possession offences should be assessed having regard to the nature, quantity and content of the material and communications.' 'Whether a penalty other than full-time imprisonment, including a suspended sentence, was appropriate.' 'How the sentences for the three sequences should be structured having regard to concurrency, partial accumulation and totality.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender's guilty pleas warranted a 20% discount, but the offences required full-time imprisonment because of their objective seriousness, the exploitative nature of child pornography offences, and the need for general deterrence and denunciation. The dissemination offence, involving internet chat logs over a lengthy period in a network of like-minded participants, fell below the halfway mark of objective seriousness and initially warranted about three and a half years. Each possession offence, involving 192 items across two computers including level 4 and level 5 material, fell between the low end and halfway mark and initially warranted about two and a half years. Having regard to...
Court Disposition
The offender was convicted on all three sequences and sentenced to imprisonment. The overall effect was a 17-month non-parole period, with the earliest date of release being 26 October 2012, followed by supervision on parole.
Orders
- ['Sequence 1 - Disseminating child pornography: The offender is convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 2 years commencing on 27 May 2011 and expiring on 26 May 2013, with a non-parole period of 14 months commencing on 27 May 2011 and expiring on 26 July 2012 and a balance of term from 27 July 2012 to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment