JIW v DPP (NSW) [2005] NSWSC 760

JIW v DPP (NSW) [2005] NSWSC 760

The Magistrate did not err in law by failing to explicitly address each consideration from s18 of the Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 under s31(3), nor was there a failure to provide reasons under s31(4); the discretion was properly exercised on the material before the Magistrate.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 July 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, and Appeal Itself
Outcome
Appeal dismissed. Extension of time and leave to appeal granted. Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs.
Legal Topics
['children (criminal Proceedings) Act 1987' 'summary Jurisdiction' 'dangerous Driving Occasioning Death' 'committal Proceedings' 'duty to Give Reasons']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, and Appeal Itself

  1. 1 ['Did the Magistrate err in deciding under s31(3) that the charge may not properly be disposed of in a summary manner?' 'Did the Magistrate comply with s31(4) Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 by furnishing reasons for the committal decision?']

Ratio Decidendi

The Magistrate did not err in law by failing to explicitly address each consideration from s18 of the Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 under s31(3), nor was there a failure to provide reasons under s31(4); the discretion was properly exercised on the material before the Magistrate.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed. Extension of time and leave to appeal granted. Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs.

Orders

  • ['An extension of time to appeal is granted.' 'Leave to appeal is granted.' 'Appeal is dismissed.' "Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs."]