R v Isaacs (a pseudonym) [2021] NSWDC 401
The evidence of the complainant's interviews and complaint evidence was found unreliable due to leading questions, inconsistencies, lack of detail, and possible confusion with prior incidents; the Crown failed to prove any charge beyond reasonable doubt.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Verdict
- Outcome
- acquittal
- Legal Topics
- ['child Sex Offences' 'sexual Intercourse With Child Under 10' 'attempted Sexual Intercourse With Child Under 10' 'indecent Assault Child Under 10']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Verdict
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether accused committed sexual intercourse with child under 10' 'Whether accused committed indecent assault on child under 10' 'Whether accused attempted sexual intercourse with child under 10']
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence of the complainant's interviews and complaint evidence was found unreliable due to leading questions, inconsistencies, lack of detail, and possible confusion with prior incidents; the Crown failed to prove any charge beyond reasonable doubt.
Court Disposition
acquittal
Orders
- ['Count 1 Not Guilty' 'Count 2 Not Guilty' 'Count 3 Not Guilty']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment