R v CB [2021] NSWDC 800
Taking into account the serious objective criminality of repeated sexual offending against three very young victims, relevant aggravating features, the need for general deterrence and retribution, and totality, but also the offender's youth at the time of many offences, difficult background, modest prior record, absence of further sexual offending for about seven years, onerous COVID custody conditions and need for rehabilitation, an aggregate sentence of ten years imprisonment with a non-parole period of five years and six months was appropriate and special circumstances were established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence for Child Sex Offences / Sentencing After Jury Verdicts of Guilty on 13 Counts
- Outcome
- Offender convicted on each offence and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of ten years with a non-parole period of five years and six months; special circumstances found.
- Legal Topics
- ['child Sex Offences' 'sexual Intercourse With Child Under 10' 'sexual Intercourse With Child Between 10 and 14' 'indecent Assault' 'aggravating Factors' 'mitigating Factors' 'aggregate Sentence' 'non Parole Period' 'special Circumstances']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence for Child Sex Offences / Sentencing After Jury Verdicts of Guilty on 13 Counts
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What aggregate sentence and non-parole period should be imposed for 13 child sex offences committed against three foster children between 2004 and 2014.' "How the objective seriousness and moral culpability of each offence should be assessed, including the offender's youth at the time of many counts, the victims' ages, use of force or threats, home setting, and multiple victims." "What weight should be given to general deterrence, retribution, protection of children, the offender's difficult background, absence of sexual reoffending since 2014, mental health, lack of remorse, and custody during the COVID pandemic." 'Whether special circumstances justified a longer parole period.']
Ratio Decidendi
Taking into account the serious objective criminality of repeated sexual offending against three very young victims, relevant aggravating features, the need for general deterrence and retribution, and totality, but also the offender's youth at the time of many offences, difficult background, modest prior record, absence of further sexual offending for about seven years, onerous COVID custody conditions and need for rehabilitation, an aggregate sentence of ten years imprisonment with a non-parole period of five years and six months was appropriate and special circumstances were established.
Court Disposition
Offender convicted on each offence and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of ten years with a non-parole period of five years and six months; special circumstances found.
Orders
- ['The offender is convicted of each offence.' 'Indicative sentence for Count 1: one year.' 'Indicative sentence for Count 2: three years and six months.' 'Indicative sentence for Count 3: five years.' 'Indicative sentence for Count 4: two years and six months.' 'Indicative sentence for Count 5: three years.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment