R v McGarrigle [2024] NSWDC 620
Given the deliberate and repeated sexual offending against a child under 10, involving a breach of trust and significant objective seriousness, only a lengthy sentence of imprisonment adequately reflects the seriousness of the offences, the need for general deterrence, denunciation, and protection of the community. Aggregate sentencing principles require the sentence not to be crushing but to contain sufficient punishment and scope for rehabilitation.
- Parties
- Offender: Stephen Colin McGarrigle; Crown: Public Prosecutions (NSW)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Aggregate sentence of imprisonment of 14 years with a non-parole period of 9 years 6 months imposed.
- Legal Topics
- Child Sex Offences, Intentionally Sexually Touch Child Under 10, Sexual Intercourse With Child Under 10, Procuring or Grooming Child for Unlawful Sexual Activity, Possess Child Abuse Material, Sentencing, Aggravating Factors, Record of Previous Convictions, Penalties, Sentence After Trial, Relevant Factors on Sentence, General Principles, Multiple Offences, Avoiding a Crushing Sentence, Moral Culpability, Objective Seriousness, Purposes of Sentencing, Deterrence, General Deterrence, Sentencing Procedure, Instinctive Synthesis, Subjective Considerations on Sentence, Age, Health Issues, Mental Disorders, Protective Custody, Institutionalised Childhood Sexual Abuse
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Colin McGarrigle
Offender
Public Prosecutions (NSW)
Crown
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for multiple sexual offences against a child under 10?
- 2 How do aggravating and mitigating factors affect the sentence?
- 3 What weight is given to general deterrence, specific deterrence, and protection of the community in this case?
Ratio Decidendi
Given the deliberate and repeated sexual offending against a child under 10, involving a breach of trust and significant objective seriousness, only a lengthy sentence of imprisonment adequately reflects the seriousness of the offences, the need for general deterrence, denunciation, and protection of the community. Aggregate sentencing principles require the sentence not to be crushing but to contain sufficient punishment and scope for rehabilitation.
Court Disposition
Aggregate sentence of imprisonment of 14 years with a non-parole period of 9 years 6 months imposed.
Orders
- Count 1 – Sexual touching: 2 years 6 months (NP 1 year 7 months)
- Count 2 – Sexual touching: 2 years 6 months (NP 1 year 7 months)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment