R v Barbros Ocek [2018] NSWDC 349
The offender’s offending involved extensive grooming, deception, manipulation, child sexual abuse, production and possession of child abuse material, and use of carriage services against multiple complainants, much of it while on parole or conditional liberty and after prior similar offences. Despite a 25% discount for early guilty pleas and some special circumstances requiring supervision, the objective seriousness, high risk of recidivism, poor rehabilitation prospects, need for community protection, general deterrence, denunciation and total criminality required an overall sentence of 20 years imprisonment with an overall non-parole period of 15 years.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Committal for Sentence Following Pleas of Guilty in the Local Court
- Outcome
- The offender was sentenced to an overall term of 20 years imprisonment with an overall non-parole period of 15 years.
- Legal Topics
- ['child Sexual Offences' 'persistent Child Sexual Abuse' 'child Abuse Material' 'using a Carriage Service to Procure or Solicit Child Pornography' 'sex Offender Reporting Obligations' 'intimidation' 'blackmail' 'aggregate Sentences' 'form 1 Offences' 'suppression and Non Publication Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Committal for Sentence Following Pleas of Guilty in the Local Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentences should be imposed for 38 substantive State and Commonwealth offences, 10 Form 1 offences and one related summary offence following early guilty pleas.' 'How to assess objective seriousness, total criminality, totality, concurrency and partial accumulation across numerous child sexual offences, grooming offences, child abuse material offences and Commonwealth carriage service offences.' 'What discount should be allowed for early pleas of guilty.' 'Whether special circumstances justified a longer parole period and how the overall non-parole period should be structured.' 'Whether non-publication orders should be made to protect complainants and victims.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender’s offending involved extensive grooming, deception, manipulation, child sexual abuse, production and possession of child abuse material, and use of carriage services against multiple complainants, much of it while on parole or conditional liberty and after prior similar offences. Despite a 25% discount for early guilty pleas and some special circumstances requiring supervision, the objective seriousness, high risk of recidivism, poor rehabilitation prospects, need for community protection, general deterrence, denunciation and total criminality required an overall sentence of 20 years imprisonment with an overall non-parole period of 15 years.
Court Disposition
The offender was sentenced to an overall term of 20 years imprisonment with an overall non-parole period of 15 years.
Orders
- ['Non-publication order preventing publication of the identity or anything that might identify any named complainant or victim; complainants and victims to be referred to by initials.' 'For counts 7, 8, 9, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 and 37, aggregate sentence of 5 years commencing...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment