R v Matavesi [2020] NSWDC 539

R v Matavesi [2020] NSWDC 539

The offender's objectively serious, violent and prolonged offending, involving repeated choking, detention, threats, weapons, actual bodily harm, property damage, victim trauma, prior offending and breach of an Intensive Correction Order, required a substantial term of imprisonment. However, the early guilty pleas, deprived and traumatic background, mental health issues, longstanding substance abuse, need for treatment and special circumstances justified moderated indicated sentences and an aggregate sentence of five years and three months with a non-parole period of three years.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 July 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentencing After Guilty Pleas in the Local Court
Outcome
Aggregate sentence of five years and three months with a non-parole period of three years.
Legal Topics
['choke With Intent to Commit a Serious Indictable Offence Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'aggravated Detention With Intent' 'use an Offensive Weapon With Intent to Commit an Indictable Offence' 'intentionally Damage Property' 'early Guilty Plea Discount' 'victim Impact' 'deprived Background and Trauma' 'drug and Alcohol Abuse' 'special Circumstances' 'aggregate Sentence']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['choke With Intent to Commit a Serious Indictable Offence Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'aggravated Detention With Intent' 'use an Offensive Weapon With Intent to Commit an Indictable Offence' 'intentionally Damage Property' 'early Guilty Plea Discount' 'victim Impact' 'deprived Background and Trauma' 'drug and Alcohol Abuse' 'special Circumstances' 'aggregate Sentence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentence / Sentencing After Guilty Pleas in the Local Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['What individual and aggregate sentences should be imposed for the four offences committed against the victim over approximately three hours.' "How to account for the offender's early guilty pleas and the 25% utilitarian discount." 'How to assess objective seriousness, including choking, detention, threats, weapons, actual bodily harm, property damage and the victim impact.' "How to weigh the offender's criminal history and commission of the offences while subject to an Intensive Correction Order." "How to weigh the offender's deprived and traumatic background, mental health issues, drug and alcohol abuse, intoxication and prospects of rehabilitation." 'Whether special circumstances justified a non-parole period allowing for supervision and treatment in the community.']

Ratio Decidendi

The offender's objectively serious, violent and prolonged offending, involving repeated choking, detention, threats, weapons, actual bodily harm, property damage, victim trauma, prior offending and breach of an Intensive Correction Order, required a substantial term of imprisonment. However, the early guilty pleas, deprived and traumatic background, mental health issues, longstanding substance abuse, need for treatment and special circumstances justified moderated indicated sentences and an aggregate sentence of five years and three months with a non-parole period of three years.

Court Disposition

Aggregate sentence of five years and three months with a non-parole period of three years.

Orders

  • ['For choke with intent to commit a serious indictable offence occasioning actual bodily harm, s 37(2) Crimes Act 1900, indicated sentence of three years and nine months.' 'For aggravated detention with intent, s 86(2)(b) Crimes Act, indicated sentence of three years and four months.' 'For use an offensive weapon...