Garnock & (3) Ors v Black & (4) Ors [2005] NSWSC 1217
For Torrens system land, "title" in s 112(2) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) is acquired only upon registration. The plaintiffs had not registered their transfer before the writ was registered; any equitable interest or legal estate under s 43A of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) did not amount to "title", and s 43A did not assist because the transfer was not a dealing registrable once the writ had been registered.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Supreme Court of New South Wales Equity Division Proceeding Concerning a Preliminary Question About Title to Land and a Writ of Execution / Separate Determination Before Further Trial Under R 28.2 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (nsw)
- Outcome
- Preliminary question answered in the negative.
- Legal Topics
- ['civil Procedure Act 2005 (nsw) S 112(2)' 'torrens System' 'writ for the Levy of Property' 'effect of Registration' 'meaning of Title']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Supreme Court of New South Wales Equity Division Proceeding Concerning a Preliminary Question About Title to Land and a Writ of Execution / Separate Determination Before Further Trial Under R 28.2 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (nsw)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiffs acquired title to the land within the meaning of s 112(2) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) before registration of the writ.' 'Whether title under Torrens system land is acquired before registration by payment of the purchase price, equitable ownership, or s 43A of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW).']
Ratio Decidendi
For Torrens system land, "title" in s 112(2) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) is acquired only upon registration. The plaintiffs had not registered their transfer before the writ was registered; any equitable interest or legal estate under s 43A of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) did not amount to "title", and s 43A did not assist because the transfer was not a dealing registrable once the writ had been registered.
Court Disposition
Preliminary question answered in the negative.
Orders
- ['The plaintiffs have not acquired title to the land within the meaning of s 112(2) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW).']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment