Stanford v DePuy International Limited (No 7) [2017] FCA 748
The Court approved the administrators' claimed costs and disbursements as reasonable, based on detailed affidavit evidence, supporting expert reports, and absence of objection, while noting upfront and one-off costs and that future costs should taper; the methodology and analysis supporting the costs were commercial, reasonable and sufficiently detailed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Representative Proceeding / Application for Court Approval of Payment of Administration Costs Under Settlement Scheme
- Outcome
- Administration costs and disbursements as claimed approved by the Court
- Legal Topics
- ['class Actions' 'costs' 'settlement Administration' 'court Approval of Administration Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Representative Proceeding / Application for Court Approval of Payment of Administration Costs Under Settlement Scheme
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the administration costs and disbursements claimed by the administrators of the settlement scheme are reasonable and should be approved by the Court']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court approved the administrators' claimed costs and disbursements as reasonable, based on detailed affidavit evidence, supporting expert reports, and absence of objection, while noting upfront and one-off costs and that future costs should taper; the methodology and analysis supporting the costs were commercial, reasonable and sufficiently detailed.
Court Disposition
Administration costs and disbursements as claimed approved by the Court
Orders
- ['Maurice Blackburn to be paid $1,669,685.60 costs and $453,763.82 disbursements (total $2,123,449.42) from the settlement sum for administration costs.' 'Shine Lawyers to be paid $1,164,318.93 costs and $163,398.81 disbursements (total $1,327,717.24) from the settlement sum for administration costs.' 'Shine Lawyers...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment