Reilly v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (No 5) [2023] FCA 896
The Court approved the settlement and Settlement Distribution Scheme under s 33V, finding them fair, reasonable, and just for group members; deductions for legal costs, administration costs, adverse costs insurance premiums, and reimbursement payments were allowed as appropriate; a minor variation was made to legal costs, excluding a hold back sum; limited non-publication orders were granted to protect confidential information.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Tracey Reilly; Second Applicant: Catherine Galli; First Respondent: Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ACN 005 357 522); Second Respondent: Zurich Australia Limited (ABN 92 000 010 195); Third Respondent: OnePath General Insurance Pty Limited (ACN 072 892 365); Fourth Respondent: QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited (ACN 003 191 035)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Representative Proceeding / Settlement Approval Application
- Outcome
- Settlement approved; proceedings dismissed against all respondents with bar to further claims; orders for deductions and confidentiality granted.
- Legal Topics
- Class Actions, Settlement Approval, Consumer Credit Insurance, Misleading and Deceptive Conduct, Unconscionable Conduct, Financial Product Advice, Statutory Limitation Periods
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tracey Reilly
First Applicant
Catherine Galli
Second Applicant
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ACN 005 357 522)
First Respondent
Zurich Australia Limited (ABN 92 000 010 195)
Second Respondent
OnePath General Insurance Pty Limited (ACN 072 892 365)
Third Respondent
QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited (ACN 003 191 035)
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Representative Proceeding / Settlement Approval Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the proposed settlement fair and reasonable under s 33V of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)?
- 2 Is the proposed Settlement Distribution Scheme just, including the application of the Loss Assessment Formula?
- 3 Are deductions for legal costs and expenses, including a success fee, adverse costs insurance, and reimbursement payments, permissible?
Ratio Decidendi
The Court approved the settlement and Settlement Distribution Scheme under s 33V, finding them fair, reasonable, and just for group members; deductions for legal costs, administration costs, adverse costs insurance premiums, and reimbursement payments were allowed as appropriate; a minor variation was made to legal costs, excluding a hold back sum; limited non-publication orders were granted to protect confidential information.
Court Disposition
Settlement approved; proceedings dismissed against all respondents with bar to further claims; orders for deductions and confidentiality granted.
Orders
- Settlement of the proceeding approved as per the Settlement Deeds and Settlement Distribution Scheme.
- Applicants authorised to enter into the Settlement Deeds on behalf of Bound Group Members.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment