Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage, Department of Premier and Cabinet v Powell [2012] NSWLEC 129
The Court held that s 10 was not appropriate because the offence was not small or trivial, the clearing continued after departmental contact and relevant advice, the defendant had full control of the offending operation and could have avoided unacceptable harm by seeking approval or advice, and general deterrence required conviction. The offence was of moderate objective gravity, caused environmental harm at the lower end of medium, and warranted a fine of $160,000 before a 25% guilty plea discount, resulting in a $120,000 fine plus costs and appropriate investigation expenses.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Class 5 Prosecution for Environmental Offence Under S 12(1) of the Native Vegetation Act 2003 / Sentencing After Brian Clifford Powell's Plea of Guilty; Related Charges Against Cleo's Unitisation Pty Limited Dismissed by Consent
- Outcome
- Charges against Cleo's Unitisation Pty Limited dismissed by consent with no order as to costs; Brian Clifford Powell found guilty, convicted and fined $120,000, with costs and appropriate investigation expenses ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['clearing of Native Vegetation Without Approval' 'native Vegetation Act 2003' 'property Vegetation Plan' 'koala Habitat' 'strict Liability Environmental Offences' 'section 10 Dismissal' 'costs and Investigation Expenses']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 5 Prosecution for Environmental Offence Under S 12(1) of the Native Vegetation Act 2003 / Sentencing After Brian Clifford Powell's Plea of Guilty; Related Charges Against Cleo's Unitisation Pty Limited Dismissed by Consent
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a conviction should be recorded or the offence dealt with under s 10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999' 'Assessment of the objective seriousness of clearing native vegetation without development consent or a property vegetation plan' 'Assessment of environmental harm caused by clearing River Red Gum vegetation including mature and hollow-bearing trees' "Whether the defendant's plea, cooperation, character and asserted misunderstanding warranted mitigation beyond the guilty plea discount" 'Whether costs and investigation expenses should be ordered']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that s 10 was not appropriate because the offence was not small or trivial, the clearing continued after departmental contact and relevant advice, the defendant had full control of the offending operation and could have avoided unacceptable harm by seeking approval or advice, and general deterrence required conviction. The offence was of moderate objective gravity, caused environmental harm at the lower end of medium, and warranted a fine of $160,000 before a 25% guilty plea discount, resulting in a $120,000 fine plus costs and appropriate investigation expenses.
Court Disposition
Charges against Cleo's Unitisation Pty Limited dismissed by consent with no order as to costs; Brian Clifford Powell found guilty, convicted and fined $120,000, with costs and appropriate investigation expenses ordered.
Orders
- ['In matters 50359 and 50518 of 2011, the charges against the defendant company are dismissed, by consent, with no order as to costs.' 'In matter 50358 of 2011, Brian Clifford Powell is found guilty, and convicted, of the offence charged in the summons.' "The defendant Powell is fined a sum of $120,000, and ordered...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment