R v Norris [2023] NSWDC 659

R v Norris [2023] NSWDC 659

Only evidence concerning Fires 12 – 14 and 16 – 19 was found to have significant probative value as coincidence evidence relevant to the issues in the trial. Admitting this evidence, taken at its highest, the court found the probative value substantially outweighed any prejudicial effect, and the evidence was admitted under s 98 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).

Parties
Crown: Director of Public Prosecutions; Accused: Anthony Philip Norris
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 June 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial Ruling on Admissibility of Coincidence Evidence
Outcome
Evidence concerning Fires 12 – 14 and 16 – 19 admitted as coincidence evidence under s 98 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)
Legal Topics
Coincidence Evidence, Tendency Evidence, Admissibility of Evidence, Probative Value, Prejudice, Arson
Criminal Law Coincidence Evidence Tendency Evidence Admissibility of Evidence Probative Value Prejudice Arson

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Director of Public Prosecutions

Crown

Anthony Philip Norris

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Pre Trial Ruling on Admissibility of Coincidence Evidence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether coincidence evidence concerning prior fires is admissible under s 98 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)
  2. 2 Whether the probative value of the evidence substantially outweighs any prejudicial effect under s 101 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)

Ratio Decidendi

Only evidence concerning Fires 12 – 14 and 16 – 19 was found to have significant probative value as coincidence evidence relevant to the issues in the trial. Admitting this evidence, taken at its highest, the court found the probative value substantially outweighed any prejudicial effect, and the evidence was admitted under s 98 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).

Court Disposition

Evidence concerning Fires 12 – 14 and 16 – 19 admitted as coincidence evidence under s 98 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)

Orders

  • Evidence concerning Fires 12 – 14 and 16 – 19 admitted pursuant to s 98 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)