T & L Alexandria Pty Ltd v Sharvain Facades Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 947
The landlords' right under the lease to demand retrospective payment for actual outgoings is subject to an implied term requiring the demand to be made within a reasonable time after the relevant outgoings year, assessed by reference to the date that all necessary information was available. The landlords' July 2019 and January 2020 demands for outgoings were not validly made within that period and fail. The landlords' threats to terminate the lease for non-payment of these amounts constituted repudiation. Sharvain accepted the repudiation and validly terminated the lease. Both sides' other claims, including alleged misleading or deceptive conduct, loss of bargain damages, make good and...
- Parties
- First Plaintiff/first Cross Defendant: T & L Alexandria Pty Ltd (ACN 624 661 776) as trustee for the T & L Alexandria Family Trust; Second Plaintiff/second Cross Defendant: T & L Reich Investments Pty Ltd (ACN 081 629 156); First Defendant/cross Claimant: Sharvain Facades Pty Ltd (ACN 116 437 462); Second Defendant: Bernard Matthew McSorley
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Principal Judgment / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' claims dismissed; declaration for the cross-claimant that it validly terminated the lease; other cross-claims dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Commercial Lease, Lease Interpretation, Implied Terms, Repudiation, Termination of Lease, Estoppel, Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Fixtures and Fittings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
T & L Alexandria Pty Ltd (ACN 624 661 776) as trustee for the T & L Alexandria Family Trust
First Plaintiff/first Cross Defendant
T & L Reich Investments Pty Ltd (ACN 081 629 156)
Second Plaintiff/second Cross Defendant
Sharvain Facades Pty Ltd (ACN 116 437 462)
First Defendant/cross Claimant
Bernard Matthew McSorley
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether TLR/TLA could demand retrospective payment of outgoings under the commercial leases
- 2 Whether the landlord's right to reconcile and demand payment of outgoings is subject to a reasonable time
- 3 Whether Sharvain was liable to pay historic outgoings under expired leases
Ratio Decidendi
The landlords' right under the lease to demand retrospective payment for actual outgoings is subject to an implied term requiring the demand to be made within a reasonable time after the relevant outgoings year, assessed by reference to the date that all necessary information was available. The landlords' July 2019 and January 2020 demands for outgoings were not validly made within that period and fail. The landlords' threats to terminate the lease for non-payment of these amounts constituted repudiation. Sharvain accepted the repudiation and validly terminated the lease. Both sides' other claims, including alleged misleading or deceptive conduct, loss of bargain damages, make good and...
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' claims dismissed; declaration for the cross-claimant that it validly terminated the lease; other cross-claims dismissed.
Orders
- Dismiss the plaintiffs' claims for relief against the defendants.
- Declare that the cross-claimant validly terminated the lease between the first cross-defendant (as landlord) and the cross-claimant (as tenant) dated on or about 1 March 2019 of the premises known as Unit 6 and Unit 7, 119-133 McEvoy Street, Alexandria, by notice in writing given to the first cross-defendant on 29...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment