R v Ansari, Ansari & Ansari [2006] NSWDC 141
Parliament deliberately granted the DPP broad powers to bring ex officio indictments for Commonwealth offences in State courts, including the District Court, and those powers are not limited to those held by the Attorney-General under s 71A of the Judiciary Act; thus, the current indictment is valid and the trial will proceed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Trial; Ruling on Objection to Jurisdiction/process
- Outcome
- Objection to jurisdiction/process dismissed; trial to proceed.
- Legal Topics
- ['commonwealth Ex Officio Indictments' 'director of Public Prosecutions Powers' "attorney General's Role in Prosecutions" 'jurisdiction of State Courts for Commonwealth Offences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial; Ruling on Objection to Jurisdiction/process
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Commonwealth DPP has authority to prosecute by ex officio indictment in the District Court of NSW for Commonwealth offences' 'Whether the powers of the DPP exceed those of the Attorney-General under s 71A Judiciary Act and DPP Act']
Ratio Decidendi
Parliament deliberately granted the DPP broad powers to bring ex officio indictments for Commonwealth offences in State courts, including the District Court, and those powers are not limited to those held by the Attorney-General under s 71A of the Judiciary Act; thus, the current indictment is valid and the trial will proceed.
Court Disposition
Objection to jurisdiction/process dismissed; trial to proceed.
Orders
- ['Trial to proceed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment