R v O'HALLORAN [2000] NSWSC 704
The Commonwealth DPP has power to prosecute as the Corporations Law operates as part of a cooperative legislative scheme and falls within constitutional heads of power (notably trade and commerce, corporations), s 998 creates a single offence and applies to instructions given to stockbrokers, and reliance by the DPP on all relevant share sales does not constitute an abuse of process given the distinction between civil and criminal proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Motion to Quash Indictment
- Outcome
- motion dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['commonwealth Prosecutorial Power' 'indictment Duplicity' 'corporations Law S 998' 'market Manipulation' 'abuse of Process']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Motion to Quash Indictment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions has power to bring this prosecution' 'Whether the indictment is bad for duplicity' 'Whether s 998 applies to the instruction given by the applicant to a stockbroker' 'Whether prosecution in part would be an abuse of process']
Ratio Decidendi
The Commonwealth DPP has power to prosecute as the Corporations Law operates as part of a cooperative legislative scheme and falls within constitutional heads of power (notably trade and commerce, corporations), s 998 creates a single offence and applies to instructions given to stockbrokers, and reliance by the DPP on all relevant share sales does not constitute an abuse of process given the distinction between civil and criminal proceedings.
Court Disposition
motion dismissed
Orders
- ['This order certified as a proper one for determination on appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment