Paul Henry Johnson v Judge Phelan and Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2001] NSWCA 258
The informations alleging breach of the Community Service Order were laid and warrants issued on 25 September 1996 and 14 October 1996 while the order was still in force. Those steps, not the claimant's later arrest, constituted the commencement of 'proceedings for an offence' under s 23 of the Community Service Orders Act 1979. The procedure complied with s 24, so the claimant's construction was wrong and the summons should be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Summons Seeking an Order Directing a District Court Judge to State a Case to the Court of Criminal Appeal in Respect of District Court Criminal Appeal Proceedings / Court of Appeal Determination of Summons
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['community Service Order Breach' 'warrant for Arrest' 'commencement of Proceedings' 'state a Case' 'functus Officio']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Summons Seeking an Order Directing a District Court Judge to State a Case to the Court of Criminal Appeal in Respect of District Court Criminal Appeal Proceedings / Court of Appeal Determination of Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether execution of warrants for the claimant's arrest was unlawful because the Community Service Order had expired more than one month before his arrest." "Whether the word 'proceedings' in s 23 of the Community Service Orders Act 1979 referred to the actual arrest or to the laying of the information and issue of a warrant." 'Whether Judge Phelan could be directed to state a case after making final orders.']
Ratio Decidendi
The informations alleging breach of the Community Service Order were laid and warrants issued on 25 September 1996 and 14 October 1996 while the order was still in force. Those steps, not the claimant's later arrest, constituted the commencement of 'proceedings for an offence' under s 23 of the Community Service Orders Act 1979. The procedure complied with s 24, so the claimant's construction was wrong and the summons should be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed
Orders
- ['Summons dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment