R v Ronald Edward Medich (No. 21) [2017] NSWSC 199
It is in the interests of justice for Gattellari to be compelled to answer the questions; accordingly, the court will issue a certificate under s. 128 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) at the conclusion of his evidence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Witness Compulsion and Certificate Under S. 128 Evidence Act 1995 (nsw)
- Outcome
- Witness Gattellari is compelled to answer the questions and will be granted a certificate pursuant to s. 128 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).
- Legal Topics
- ['compellability of Witness' 'privilege Against Self Incrimination' 'use of Certificate Under S. 128 Evidence Act 1995 (nsw)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Witness Compulsion and Certificate Under S. 128 Evidence Act 1995 (nsw)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the answers to questions put to the witness may tend to prove the commission of an offence' 'Whether in the interests of justice for the compelled evidence to be given pursuant to s. 128 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
It is in the interests of justice for Gattellari to be compelled to answer the questions; accordingly, the court will issue a certificate under s. 128 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) at the conclusion of his evidence.
Court Disposition
Witness Gattellari is compelled to answer the questions and will be granted a certificate pursuant to s. 128 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).
Orders
- ['Gattellari will be compelled to answer the questions in court.' 'At the conclusion of his evidence, a certificate pursuant to s. 128 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) will be granted to Gattellari.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment