R v Fang (No. 2) [2016] NSWSC 1784
The presumption that Mr Weng was competent was not displaced. The evidence of Dr Furst and Dr Adams confirmed that Mr Weng had capacity to understand all questions relevant to the trial and to reply to them responsively, and his treated mental health issues did not adversely affect his competence to give evidence. He was therefore competent to give sworn evidence at the Accused's trial.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Murder Trial / Pretrial Competence Inquiry and Ruling Under S.189(1)(c) Evidence Act 1995
- Outcome
- Jian Feng Weng is competent to give sworn evidence.
- Legal Topics
- ['competence and Compellability of Witnesses' 'competence to Give Sworn Evidence' 'witness Found Unfit to Be Tried in Separate Proceedings' 'sections 12 and 13 Evidence Act 1995']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Murder Trial / Pretrial Competence Inquiry and Ruling Under S.189(1)(c) Evidence Act 1995
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Jian Feng Weng was competent to give evidence as a Crown witness in the Accused's murder trial." 'Whether Jian Feng Weng was competent to give sworn evidence notwithstanding that he had been found unfit to be tried in separate District Court proceedings.']
Ratio Decidendi
The presumption that Mr Weng was competent was not displaced. The evidence of Dr Furst and Dr Adams confirmed that Mr Weng had capacity to understand all questions relevant to the trial and to reply to them responsively, and his treated mental health issues did not adversely affect his competence to give evidence. He was therefore competent to give sworn evidence at the Accused's trial.
Court Disposition
Jian Feng Weng is competent to give sworn evidence.
Orders
- ['Jian Feng Weng is competent to give sworn evidence at the trial of the Accused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment