Thomas v SMP (International) No 6 [2010] NSWSC 1311
Compound interest with yearly rests and a rate 4% above the Reserve Bank of Australia cash rate is the most appropriate compensation for losses suffered by the plaintiffs due to the fourth defendant's serious breach of fiduciary duty, according to equitable principles and the guidance of Practice Note SC Gen 16.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (equity Division) / Post Judgment Determination of Pre Judgment Interest
- Outcome
- Compound pre-judgment interest ordered for plaintiffs at yearly rests at rates 4% above Reserve Bank of Australia cash rate.
- Legal Topics
- ['compound Interest' 'pre Judgment Interest' 'breach of Fiduciary Duty' 'compensation' 'practice Note SC Gen 16']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil (equity Division) / Post Judgment Determination of Pre Judgment Interest
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate award of pre-judgment interest (compound or simple)' 'Applicable rate and rests for interest' "Court's equitable jurisdiction to award compound interest in breach of fiduciary duty"]
Ratio Decidendi
Compound interest with yearly rests and a rate 4% above the Reserve Bank of Australia cash rate is the most appropriate compensation for losses suffered by the plaintiffs due to the fourth defendant's serious breach of fiduciary duty, according to equitable principles and the guidance of Practice Note SC Gen 16.
Court Disposition
Compound pre-judgment interest ordered for plaintiffs at yearly rests at rates 4% above Reserve Bank of Australia cash rate.
Orders
- ['Fourth defendant (Mr Willett) to pay compound interest on sums owed to plaintiffs, calculated at yearly rests at rates per Practice Note SC Gen 16.' 'Awarded amounts: $3,326,588 to Mr Thomas plus $4,382,291 compound interest; $214,373 to Mr Sullivan plus $471,972 compound interest.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment