Wheeler v War Veterans' Home [1953] HCA 29
Even if preliminary steps towards compulsory acquisition were taken in contravention of s. 118 (during applicant's protection period), those steps were not invalidated ab initio and the actual resumption occurred after protection expired; s. 130(2) does not provide retrospective invalidation and Court cannot invalidate the resumption on these grounds. The declaration that the War Veterans' Home was a public purpose was not a contravention of s. 118, as applicant's protection had lapsed at the time; further, any rights acquired by the War Veterans' Home were acquired bona fide and without notice, barring relief under s. 130(2). Accordingly, no order should be made invalidating the...
- Parties
- Appellant; Plaintiff; Executrix of the Will of James Wheeler (deceased): Alice Ann Wheeler; Appellant; Plaintiff; Executor of the Will of James Wheeler (deceased): Alan George Wheeler; Respondent; Defendant; Company Limited by Guarantee: War Veterans' Home; Respondent; Defendant: Minister for Lands for the State of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 1953
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Original Jurisdiction (high Court, Taylor J.) / Final Appeal Decision (full Court of the High Court of Australia)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Acquisition of Land, War Service Moratorium/protected Persons, Public Purpose in Resumption, Condition Precedent to Resumption, Discretion Under Federal Statute, Validity of State Compulsory Acquisition, Federal/state Legislative Interplay
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alice Ann Wheeler
Appellant; Plaintiff; Executrix of the Will of James Wheeler (deceased)
Alan George Wheeler
Appellant; Plaintiff; Executor of the Will of James Wheeler (deceased)
War Veterans' Home
Respondent; Defendant; Company Limited by Guarantee
Minister for Lands for the State of New South Wales
Respondent; Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Original Jurisdiction (high Court, Taylor J.) / Final Appeal Decision (full Court of the High Court of Australia)
Legal Issues
- 1 Were steps taken towards compulsory acquisition in contravention of s. 118 of the Re-establishment and Employment Act 1945-1952?
- 2 Can the Court invalidate those steps under s. 130(2) and would this affect the validity of the resumption?
- 3 Is the declaration that the War Veterans' Home was a public purpose within the State Act invalid under State law?
Ratio Decidendi
Even if preliminary steps towards compulsory acquisition were taken in contravention of s. 118 (during applicant's protection period), those steps were not invalidated ab initio and the actual resumption occurred after protection expired; s. 130(2) does not provide retrospective invalidation and Court cannot invalidate the resumption on these grounds. The declaration that the War Veterans' Home was a public purpose was not a contravention of s. 118, as applicant's protection had lapsed at the time; further, any rights acquired by the War Veterans' Home were acquired bona fide and without notice, barring relief under s. 130(2). Accordingly, no order should be made invalidating the...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment