Rory v Northern Territory of Australia [2015] FCA 1241
The requirements of s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) were satisfied: the notice period had ended, the parties reached and filed a written agreement on the terms of the determination, the proposed orders were within the Court's power, and it was appropriate to make them because the parties were legally represented, the Northern Territory had actively assessed the claim and relevant interests, there were no overlapping native title proceedings requiring s 67 orders, and the proposed determination complied with the Act by identifying the native title holders, rights and interests, other interests, and their relationship.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Native Title Determination Application / Consent Determination Under S 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth)
- Outcome
- Consent determination of native title made.
- Legal Topics
- ['consent Determination' 'recognition of Native Title Rights and Interests' 'prescribed Body Corporate' 'pastoral Lease' 'extinguishment and Other Interests']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Native Title Determination Application / Consent Determination Under S 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should make a determination of native title by consent under s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).' 'Whether the proposed determination identifies the native title holders, the nature and extent of native title rights and interests, other interests, and the relationship between those interests as required by the Act.' 'Whether it was appropriate to appoint The Top End (Default PBC/CLA) Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC as the prescribed body corporate and order that native title not be held on trust.']
Ratio Decidendi
The requirements of s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) were satisfied: the notice period had ended, the parties reached and filed a written agreement on the terms of the determination, the proposed orders were within the Court's power, and it was appropriate to make them because the parties were legally represented, the Northern Territory had actively assessed the claim and relevant interests, there were no overlapping native title proceedings requiring s 67 orders, and the proposed determination complied with the Act by identifying the native title holders, rights and interests, other interests, and their relationship.
Court Disposition
Consent determination of native title made.
Orders
- ['There be a determination of native title in terms of the determination set out in the orders.' 'The native title is not to be held on trust.' 'The Top End (Default PBC/CLA) Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC be appointed as the prescribed body corporate for the purposes of s 57(2) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) in...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment