Roberts on behalf of the Najig and the Guyanggan Nganawirdbird Groups v Northern Territory of Australia (No 2) [2012] FCA 254
Because the parties in NTD 6026 of 2002 had reached a consent determination seeking a determination that native title exists, while in NTD 6001 of 2001 a consent determination was being sought that no native title exists, it was appropriate and necessary to de-consolidate the hearing of the two proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Native Title Proceedings / Order De Consolidating Proceedings Previously Ordered to Be Heard Together
- Outcome
- The proceedings were ordered to be heard separately.
- Legal Topics
- ['consent Determination' 'separate Hearings' 'de Consolidation of Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Native Title Proceedings / Order De Consolidating Proceedings Previously Ordered to Be Heard Together
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether proceedings NTD 6001 of 2001 (Mataranka) and NTD 6026 of 2002 (Town of Mataranka), previously ordered to be heard together, should be heard separately.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties in NTD 6026 of 2002 had reached a consent determination seeking a determination that native title exists, while in NTD 6001 of 2001 a consent determination was being sought that no native title exists, it was appropriate and necessary to de-consolidate the hearing of the two proceedings.
Court Disposition
The proceedings were ordered to be heard separately.
Orders
- ['The proceedings NTD 6001 of 2001 (Mataranka) and NTD 6026 of 2002 (Town of Mataranka) are to be heard separately.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment