National Australia Bank Limited v Hunter & Anor [2013] NSWSC 71
The authority of the Trustee in bankruptcy to consent to judgment for possession over the property is a matter falling within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia or Federal Magistrates Court under Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 27(1), and therefore cannot be determined by this Court. Absent a finding in the applicants' favour on that question, there is no demonstrated irregularity in the entry of the consent judgment, nor sufficient cause for it to be set aside.
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: National Australia Bank Limited; First Defendant/applicant: Kim Francis Hunter; Second Defendant/applicant: Kim Lee Hunter
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Notice of Motion to Set Aside Consent Judgment
- Outcome
- Defendants' notice of motion dismissed. Consent judgment for possession is not set aside. Directions for any further judgment on costs issues.
- Legal Topics
- Consent Judgment, Trustee in Bankruptcy Authority, Setting Aside Judgments, Exclusive Jurisdiction in Bankruptcy, Possession of Property, Equitable Interests in Bankruptcy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Australia Bank Limited
Plaintiff/respondent
Kim Francis Hunter
First Defendant/applicant
Kim Lee Hunter
Second Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Notice of Motion to Set Aside Consent Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the consent judgment was entered irregularly and should be set aside under UCPR rr 36.15 or 36.16
- 2 Whether the Trustee in bankruptcy had authority to consent to judgment for possession of bankrupt's property
- 3 Whether claim to equitable interest in property divests trustee's title under Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
Ratio Decidendi
The authority of the Trustee in bankruptcy to consent to judgment for possession over the property is a matter falling within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia or Federal Magistrates Court under Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 27(1), and therefore cannot be determined by this Court. Absent a finding in the applicants' favour on that question, there is no demonstrated irregularity in the entry of the consent judgment, nor sufficient cause for it to be set aside.
Court Disposition
Defendants' notice of motion dismissed. Consent judgment for possession is not set aside. Directions for any further judgment on costs issues.
Orders
- The defendant's Notice of Motion dated 20 November 2012 is dismissed.
- The consent judgment for possession of the whole of the subject Property, entered on 7 March 2012, is not set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment