Richardson v Lo Pilato (Liquidator); In the Matter of Trojan Hospitality (ACT) Pty Limited (In Liq) [2014] FCA 888
The Court accepted Mr Richardson's unchallenged evidence that he personally drew down and paid $325,000 to Trojan only to be used, if at all, for completion of the Share Sale Agreement and not for Trojan's benefit. The Share Sale Agreement did not complete and the specific purpose failed. Applying the Quistclose trust principles, Trojan held the contested sum on trust for Kevin Richardson. Because the claim was proprietary, leave under s 471B was appropriate. The Court was sufficiently satisfied that the consent orders giving effect to the settlement between the active parties should be made, despite the liquidator's non-consent and submissions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Federal Court Corporations and Equity Proceedings Concerning Leave to Proceed Against a Company in Liquidation, a Trust Declaration, Appeals From Rejection of Proofs of Debt, and Settlement of Related Proceedings / Decided on the Papers on Interlocutory Process for Consent Orders Giving Effect to Settlement
- Outcome
- Orders made substantially by consent. In ACD 36 of 2012, leave was granted to proceed against Trojan and a declaration was made that Trojan holds $325,000 on trust for Kevin Richardson, with costs questions reserved. In ACD 67 of 2012, the proceeding and counterclaim were dismissed with no orders as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['consent Orders' 'submitting Notice' 'quistclose Trust' 'company in Liquidation' 'leave to Proceed Under S 471 B of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth)' 'proofs of Debt' 'settlement of Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Federal Court Corporations and Equity Proceedings Concerning Leave to Proceed Against a Company in Liquidation, a Trust Declaration, Appeals From Rejection of Proofs of Debt, and Settlement of Related Proceedings / Decided on the Papers on Interlocutory Process for Consent Orders Giving Effect to Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should make orders by consent to give effect to settlement of two proceedings where the liquidator had filed a submitting notice but wished to be heard and had not consented to the orders.' 'Whether the Court was satisfied on admissible and probative evidence that Trojan held the $325,000 paid on 23 March 2009 on trust for Kevin Richardson.' 'Whether leave should be granted under s 471B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to proceed against Trojan in liquidation.' 'Whether proceeding ACD 67 of 2012 should be dismissed to give effect to the settlement.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court accepted Mr Richardson's unchallenged evidence that he personally drew down and paid $325,000 to Trojan only to be used, if at all, for completion of the Share Sale Agreement and not for Trojan's benefit. The Share Sale Agreement did not complete and the specific purpose failed. Applying the Quistclose trust principles, Trojan held the contested sum on trust for Kevin Richardson. Because the claim was proprietary, leave under s 471B was appropriate. The Court was sufficiently satisfied that the consent orders giving effect to the settlement between the active parties should be made, despite the liquidator's non-consent and submissions.
Court Disposition
Orders made substantially by consent. In ACD 36 of 2012, leave was granted to proceed against Trojan and a declaration was made that Trojan holds $325,000 on trust for Kevin Richardson, with costs questions reserved. In ACD 67 of 2012, the proceeding and counterclaim were dismissed with no orders as to costs.
Orders
- ['In ACD 36 of 2012, pursuant to s 471B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), leave granted to the plaintiffs to proceed against ACN 115 869 595 Pty Limited (In Liquidation) formerly called Trojan Hospitality (ACT) Pty Limited (In Liquidation).' 'In ACD 36 of 2012, declared that Trojan holds the sum of $325,000 paid...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment