R v Elmir [2022] NSWDC 317
The offending was objectively very serious because the offender participated for nearly five months in a rolled-up offence involving two planned conspiracies to import very large commercial quantities of MDMA, cocaine and methamphetamine. He was not at the apex of the Dutch syndicate, but he was the lynchpin between the Sydney-based and Dutch-based syndicates, had autonomy and decision-making responsibility in pricing and logistics, and acted for substantial reward motivated by greed. The undercover operation did not materially reduce his moral culpability because he was willing to import substantial quantities and wanted smaller initial quantities only to test the door. Full-time...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing for Commonwealth Offence of Conspiracy to Import Commercial Quantities of Border Controlled Drugs / Sentence Following Plea of Guilty
- Outcome
- The offender was convicted and sentenced to a total term of 24 years' imprisonment, comprising a non-parole period of 14 years and an additional term of 10 years.
- Legal Topics
- ['conspiracy to Import Commercial Quantities of MDMA, Cocaine and Methamphetamine' 'rolled Up Conspiracy Offence' 'undercover Police Operation' 'objective Seriousness' 'parity With Co Conspirator' 'utilitarian Value of Guilty Plea' 'extra Curial Punishment' 'delay' 'covid 19 Custody Conditions' 'prospects of Rehabilitation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Commonwealth Offence of Conspiracy to Import Commercial Quantities of Border Controlled Drugs / Sentence Following Plea of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for a rolled-up Commonwealth offence covering two conspiracies to import commercial quantities of border-controlled drugs' "Whether and to what extent the undercover operation and the role of undercover operative Zane reduced the offender's culpability" "How the offender's role compared with co-conspirator Mustafa Ibrahim for purposes of parity" "What mitigating weight should be given to the offender's guilty plea, background of deprivation and disadvantage, mental health, extra-curial punishment, delay and COVID-19 custody conditions"]
Ratio Decidendi
The offending was objectively very serious because the offender participated for nearly five months in a rolled-up offence involving two planned conspiracies to import very large commercial quantities of MDMA, cocaine and methamphetamine. He was not at the apex of the Dutch syndicate, but he was the lynchpin between the Sydney-based and Dutch-based syndicates, had autonomy and decision-making responsibility in pricing and logistics, and acted for substantial reward motivated by greed. The undercover operation did not materially reduce his moral culpability because he was willing to import substantial quantities and wanted smaller initial quantities only to test the door. Full-time...
Court Disposition
The offender was convicted and sentenced to a total term of 24 years' imprisonment, comprising a non-parole period of 14 years and an additional term of 10 years.
Orders
- ['The offender is convicted.' "A non-parole period of 14 years' imprisonment is imposed, commencing on 8 August 2017 and expiring on 7 August 2031." "An additional term of 10 years' imprisonment is imposed." 'The total period of imprisonment is 24 years.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment