The Leasing Centre (Aust) Pty Ltd v Rollpress Proplate Group Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 282
The agreement, properly construed, imposed on TLC an express obligation to give possession of the truck to Rollpress as part of a contract of hire; as TLC never gave such possession (and never acquired the right to do so), there was a total failure of consideration and Rollpress is entitled to recover payments made. TLC is not entitled to damages or further payments as Rollpress's non-payment was not a breach.
- Parties
- Plaintiff/cross Defendant: The Leasing Centre (Aust) Pty Limited; First Defendant/cross Claimant: Rollpress Proplate Group Pty Limited; Second Defendant/guarantor: RPG Australia Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Principal Judgment / Final Judgment After Hearing of Claim and Cross Claim
- Outcome
- Judgment for the first and second defendants on the statement of claim; judgment for Rollpress (first defendant/cross-claimant) on the cross-claim against the plaintiff for $52,768.20 plus interest and costs.
- Legal Topics
- Construction and Interpretation of Contracts, Implied and Express Contractual Terms, Recital as Covenant, Estoppel by Convention, Total Failure of Consideration, Restitution for Payments Made, Bailment and Hire of Chattels
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Leasing Centre (Aust) Pty Limited
Plaintiff/cross Defendant
Rollpress Proplate Group Pty Limited
First Defendant/cross Claimant
RPG Australia Pty Limited
Second Defendant/guarantor
Procedural Posture
Principal Judgment / Final Judgment After Hearing of Claim and Cross Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the rental agreement imposed an obligation on The Leasing Centre (Aust) Pty Limited (TLC) to give possession of the forklift truck to Rollpress Proplate Group Pty Limited (Rollpress)
- 2 Whether there was a total failure of consideration allowing Rollpress to recover sums paid under the agreement
- 3 Whether TLC was entitled to damages for breach or repudiation of contract by Rollpress
Ratio Decidendi
The agreement, properly construed, imposed on TLC an express obligation to give possession of the truck to Rollpress as part of a contract of hire; as TLC never gave such possession (and never acquired the right to do so), there was a total failure of consideration and Rollpress is entitled to recover payments made. TLC is not entitled to damages or further payments as Rollpress's non-payment was not a breach.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the first and second defendants on the statement of claim; judgment for Rollpress (first defendant/cross-claimant) on the cross-claim against the plaintiff for $52,768.20 plus interest and costs.
Orders
- Judgment for the first defendant and the second defendant on the further amended statement of claim.
- Judgment against the plaintiff/cross-defendant and in favour of the first defendant/cross-claimant in the sum of $52,768.20 together with interest at the rates specified in Schedule 5 to the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 for specified periods on the respective amounts.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment