Valmont Interiors Pty Limited v Giorgio Armani Australia Pty Limited [2020] NSWDC 395

Valmont Interiors Pty Limited v Giorgio Armani Australia Pty Limited [2020] NSWDC 395

Plaintiff entitled to payment for balance of contract price and certain variations approved or estopped from denial, but not for variations after defendant ceased approval; defendant entitled to liquidated damages for delay and to costs of defects rectification; contractual procedure for variations and extensions of time is enforced except where estoppel applies up to specific date.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 August 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil / Principal Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $130,973; judgment for defendant on cross claim in the sum of $235,611.29; plaintiff to pay 50% of defendant's costs.
Legal Topics
['construction Contract' 'delay Damages' 'defective Works' 'variation Claims' 'liquidated Damages' 'completion' 'scope of Work']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Principal Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether works performed by plaintiff were outside contract scope and entitled to payment' 'Entitlement to payment for balance of contract price' 'Entitlement to payment for variations and extra works' 'Whether compliance with variation procedure was required or estopped' 'Assessment of reasonable costs of variation claims' 'Entitlement to extensions of time for completion' 'Validity of liquidated damages as a penalty' 'Extent and cost of defects rectification']

Ratio Decidendi

Plaintiff entitled to payment for balance of contract price and certain variations approved or estopped from denial, but not for variations after defendant ceased approval; defendant entitled to liquidated damages for delay and to costs of defects rectification; contractual procedure for variations and extensions of time is enforced except where estoppel applies up to specific date.

Court Disposition

Judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $130,973; judgment for defendant on cross claim in the sum of $235,611.29; plaintiff to pay 50% of defendant's costs.

Orders

  • ['Judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $130,973.00.' 'Judgment for the defendant on the cross claim in the amount of $235,611.29.' "The plaintiff to pay 50% of the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed."]